-
All Events
Critical Care Canada Forum 2023Mechanical Ventilation Symposium 2023Critical Care Canada Forum 2022Neuro Critical MasterclassMechanical Ventilation SymposiumCritical Care Canada Forum 2021 - Virtual ConferenceCritical Care Canada Forum 2020 - Virtual Conference -
All Content TypesAbstractePosterLearning moduleLive StreamPPT SharedWebcast
-
Sort ByRelevance
-
All TopicsAll Topics▸Acute Kidney Injury-Renal Replacement Therapy-Complications/Outcomes▸Acute Respiratory Failure and Mechanical Ventilation-Acute Respiratory Failure / ARDS-Mechanical Ventilation-Non-Invasive Ventilation-Weaning and Liberation▸COVID-19-Perspectives on the Pandemic-Pandemic Preparedness, Resource Allocation, and Triage-Management-Complications/Outcomes-Emerging Research/Future Directions-End of Life Care▸Extracorporeal Life Support-Respiratory Failure/ARDS-Cardiac Arrest/Cardiogenic Shock-Complications/Outcomes-Medical Education▸Neurocritical Care-Mechanical Ventilation-Traumatic Brain Injury/Sub-Arachnoid Hemorrhage-Imaging and Neuromonitoring-Post-Cardiac Arrest Care & Neuroprognostication-Seizures▸Organ Donation-Impacts of COVID on Organ Donation-Death by Neurologic Criteria-Death by Circulatory Criteria▸Patient Safety/Health Care Quality/ICU system-Healthcare Quality/Patient Safety-ICU System/Organization▸Pediatric Critical Care-Respiratory Failure/ARDS-Sepsis▸Prognostication, Recovery, and Outcomes-Prognostication-Recovery/Rehabilitation-Long-term Outcomes-Research-Sedation and Delirium▸Sepsis-Management-Complications/Outcomes-Specific Infections-Emerging Research/Future Directions-Sepsis Pathophysiology▸Shock and Resuscitation-Fluid Management-Vasopressors/Inotropes▸Special Populations-Chronic Critical Illness-Geriatrics/Frailty-Obstetrical Critical Care-Oncologic Critical Care-Trauma▸Wellness, Burnout, and Equity-Wellness/Burnout-Equity-Mental Health▸Cardiac Critical Care-Cardiogenic Shock-RV Function/dysfunction-Peri-cardiac arrest care-Atrial fibrillation-Post-cardiac arrest care▸Imaging/Monitoring-Ultrasound/POCUS-Neuroimaging/Neuromonitoring-Hematology-Career Development▸Patient-Centred Care/Ethics/Communication-Patient/Family Perspectives-Ethics-Communication with Patients/Families▸Hematology-Hypercoagulability/Thrombosis-Population Health-GI dysfunction
Protected by US Patents
Login now to access Regular content available to all registered users.
Abstract
Discussion Forum (0)
ePoster
Topic: Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, or Meta-Synthesis
Results: We included 19 studies reporting on 2424 parents. Ten (53%) studies asked parents about hypothetical research and sixteen (84%) studies were qualitative in design. The median number of parents in each study was 68, the median percentage of fathers included was 22% and seven (37%) studies included bereaved parents. Included studies focused mostly on parental reasons for consent refusal (68%) and general attitudes towards research participation (63%). Parents were mostly approached in the ICU or emergency room (42%) and more than one year after hospital discharge (21%).
Topic: Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, or Meta-Synthesis
Tchakerian, Natalie1; Ahmad, Abeer1; Duffett, Mark2
1Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; 1Department of Pediatrcis, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
Introduction: Prospective informed consent, most often from parents or legal guardians, is the standard and ethically accepted practice in pediatric clinical research. In critically ill children, obtaining timely and fully informed consent is especially difficult.
Objective: To review published studies exploring parental attitudes toward participation in pediatric clinical research.
Methods: This scoping review includes original research of any design including parents of children admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) or hospitalized with severe or acute illness. We excluded studies focusing on neonates and studies failing to include parental attitudes. We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE (January 2019) and two reviewers screened and assessed publications independently for eligibility.
Results: We included 19 studies reporting on 2424 parents. Ten (53%) studies asked parents about hypothetical research and sixteen (84%) studies were qualitative in design. The median number of parents in each study was 68, the median percentage of fathers included was 22% and seven (37%) studies included bereaved parents. Included studies focused mostly on parental reasons for consent refusal (68%) and general attitudes towards research participation (63%). Parents were mostly approached in the ICU or emergency room (42%) and more than one year after hospital discharge (21%).
Conclusions:This review demonstrates that parents are more accepting of certain consent processes depending on their child's illness severity. However, most studies failed to obtain parental suggestions on potential improvements of these processes. The limited literature including fathers and bereaved parents, supports the need for developing a more holistic understanding of parental attitudes towards research.
no references
ePoster
Topic: Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, or Meta-Synthesis
Results: We included 19 studies reporting on 2424 parents. Ten (53%) studies asked parents about hypothetical research and sixteen (84%) studies were qualitative in design. The median number of parents in each study was 68, the median percentage of fathers included was 22% and seven (37%) studies included bereaved parents. Included studies focused mostly on parental reasons for consent refusal (68%) and general attitudes towards research participation (63%). Parents were mostly approached in the ICU or emergency room (42%) and more than one year after hospital discharge (21%).
Topic: Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, or Meta-Synthesis
Tchakerian, Natalie1; Ahmad, Abeer1; Duffett, Mark2
1Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; 1Department of Pediatrcis, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
Introduction: Prospective informed consent, most often from parents or legal guardians, is the standard and ethically accepted practice in pediatric clinical research. In critically ill children, obtaining timely and fully informed consent is especially difficult.
Objective: To review published studies exploring parental attitudes toward participation in pediatric clinical research.
Methods: This scoping review includes original research of any design including parents of children admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) or hospitalized with severe or acute illness. We excluded studies focusing on neonates and studies failing to include parental attitudes. We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE (January 2019) and two reviewers screened and assessed publications independently for eligibility.
Results: We included 19 studies reporting on 2424 parents. Ten (53%) studies asked parents about hypothetical research and sixteen (84%) studies were qualitative in design. The median number of parents in each study was 68, the median percentage of fathers included was 22% and seven (37%) studies included bereaved parents. Included studies focused mostly on parental reasons for consent refusal (68%) and general attitudes towards research participation (63%). Parents were mostly approached in the ICU or emergency room (42%) and more than one year after hospital discharge (21%).
Conclusions:This review demonstrates that parents are more accepting of certain consent processes depending on their child's illness severity. However, most studies failed to obtain parental suggestions on potential improvements of these processes. The limited literature including fathers and bereaved parents, supports the need for developing a more holistic understanding of parental attitudes towards research.
no references
What is known about parental attitudes towards participation in pediatric critical care research? A scoping review
Mark Duffett
Abstract
Discussion Forum (0)
ePoster
Topic: Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, or Meta-Synthesis
Results: We included 19 studies reporting on 2424 parents. Ten (53%) studies asked parents about hypothetical research and sixteen (84%) studies were qualitative in design. The median number of parents in each study was 68, the median percentage of fathers included was 22% and seven (37%) studies included bereaved parents. Included studies focused mostly on parental reasons for consent refusal (68%) and general attitudes towards research participation (63%). Parents were mostly approached in the ICU or emergency room (42%) and more than one year after hospital discharge (21%).
Topic: Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, or Meta-Synthesis
Tchakerian, Natalie1; Ahmad, Abeer1; Duffett, Mark2
1Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; 1Department of Pediatrcis, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
Introduction: Prospective informed consent, most often from parents or legal guardians, is the standard and ethically accepted practice in pediatric clinical research. In critically ill children, obtaining timely and fully informed consent is especially difficult.
Objective: To review published studies exploring parental attitudes toward participation in pediatric clinical research.
Methods: This scoping review includes original research of any design including parents of children admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) or hospitalized with severe or acute illness. We excluded studies focusing on neonates and studies failing to include parental attitudes. We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE (January 2019) and two reviewers screened and assessed publications independently for eligibility.
Results: We included 19 studies reporting on 2424 parents. Ten (53%) studies asked parents about hypothetical research and sixteen (84%) studies were qualitative in design. The median number of parents in each study was 68, the median percentage of fathers included was 22% and seven (37%) studies included bereaved parents. Included studies focused mostly on parental reasons for consent refusal (68%) and general attitudes towards research participation (63%). Parents were mostly approached in the ICU or emergency room (42%) and more than one year after hospital discharge (21%).
Conclusions:This review demonstrates that parents are more accepting of certain consent processes depending on their child's illness severity. However, most studies failed to obtain parental suggestions on potential improvements of these processes. The limited literature including fathers and bereaved parents, supports the need for developing a more holistic understanding of parental attitudes towards research.
no references
ePoster
Topic: Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, or Meta-Synthesis
Results: We included 19 studies reporting on 2424 parents. Ten (53%) studies asked parents about hypothetical research and sixteen (84%) studies were qualitative in design. The median number of parents in each study was 68, the median percentage of fathers included was 22% and seven (37%) studies included bereaved parents. Included studies focused mostly on parental reasons for consent refusal (68%) and general attitudes towards research participation (63%). Parents were mostly approached in the ICU or emergency room (42%) and more than one year after hospital discharge (21%).
Topic: Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, or Meta-Synthesis
Tchakerian, Natalie1; Ahmad, Abeer1; Duffett, Mark2
1Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; 1Department of Pediatrcis, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
Introduction: Prospective informed consent, most often from parents or legal guardians, is the standard and ethically accepted practice in pediatric clinical research. In critically ill children, obtaining timely and fully informed consent is especially difficult.
Objective: To review published studies exploring parental attitudes toward participation in pediatric clinical research.
Methods: This scoping review includes original research of any design including parents of children admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) or hospitalized with severe or acute illness. We excluded studies focusing on neonates and studies failing to include parental attitudes. We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE (January 2019) and two reviewers screened and assessed publications independently for eligibility.
Results: We included 19 studies reporting on 2424 parents. Ten (53%) studies asked parents about hypothetical research and sixteen (84%) studies were qualitative in design. The median number of parents in each study was 68, the median percentage of fathers included was 22% and seven (37%) studies included bereaved parents. Included studies focused mostly on parental reasons for consent refusal (68%) and general attitudes towards research participation (63%). Parents were mostly approached in the ICU or emergency room (42%) and more than one year after hospital discharge (21%).
Conclusions:This review demonstrates that parents are more accepting of certain consent processes depending on their child's illness severity. However, most studies failed to obtain parental suggestions on potential improvements of these processes. The limited literature including fathers and bereaved parents, supports the need for developing a more holistic understanding of parental attitudes towards research.
no references
{{ help_message }}
{{filter}}