CCCF Academy

Create Account Sign In
slider image
Login now to access Regular content available to all registered users.
Abstract
Discussion Forum (0)

Introduction:

Restrictive transfusion strategies have been advocated in the general critically ill population. However, considerable uncertainty exists regarding optimal transfusion thresholds in critically ill traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients due to the susceptibility of the injured brain to hypoxemic damages. We aimed to identify the determinants of red blood cell transfusion (RBC), and to ascertain the perceived optimal transfusion thresholds in adult patients with moderate to severe TBI.

 

Methods:

We conducted an electronic self-administered survey targeting all intensivists and neurosurgeons from Canada, Australia and the United Kingdom caring for TBI patients. The questionnaire was developed using a structured process of domains/items generation and reduction with a panel of experts. It was validated for clinical sensibility, reliability and content validity. 

 

Results:

The response rate was 28.7% (218/760). When presented with a scenario of a young patient with severe TBI, a wide range of transfusion practices was noted among respondents, with 47% favoring RBC transfusion at a hemoglobin level of 7g/dL or less in the acute phase of care, while 73% would use this trigger in the plateau phase. Multiple trauma, neuromonitoring data, hemorrhagic shock and planned surgeries were the most important factors thought to influence the need for transfusion. The level of evidence was the main reason mentioned to explain the uncertainty regarding RBC transfusion strategies. 

 

Conclusion:

In critically ill TBI patients, transfusion practices and hemoglobin thresholds for transfusion are said to be influenced by patients’ characteristics and the use of neuromonitoring in critical care physicians and neurosurgeons from Canada, Australia and the UK. Equipoise regarding optimal transfusion strategy is manifest, mainly attributed to lack of clear evidences and clinical guidelines.

 


Introduction:

Restrictive transfusion strategies have been advocated in the general critically ill population. However, considerable uncertainty exists regarding optimal transfusion thresholds in critically ill traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients due to the susceptibility of the injured brain to hypoxemic damages. We aimed to identify the determinants of red blood cell transfusion (RBC), and to ascertain the perceived optimal transfusion thresholds in adult patients with moderate to severe TBI.

 

Methods:

We conducted an electronic self-administered survey targeting all intensivists and neurosurgeons from Canada, Australia and the United Kingdom caring for TBI patients. The questionnaire was developed using a structured process of domains/items generation and reduction with a panel of experts. It was validated for clinical sensibility, reliability and content validity. 

 

Results:

The response rate was 28.7% (218/760). When presented with a scenario of a young patient with severe TBI, a wide range of transfusion practices was noted among respondents, with 47% favoring RBC transfusion at a hemoglobin level of 7g/dL or less in the acute phase of care, while 73% would use this trigger in the plateau phase. Multiple trauma, neuromonitoring data, hemorrhagic shock and planned surgeries were the most important factors thought to influence the need for transfusion. The level of evidence was the main reason mentioned to explain the uncertainty regarding RBC transfusion strategies. 

 

Conclusion:

In critically ill TBI patients, transfusion practices and hemoglobin thresholds for transfusion are said to be influenced by patients’ characteristics and the use of neuromonitoring in critical care physicians and neurosurgeons from Canada, Australia and the UK. Equipoise regarding optimal transfusion strategy is manifest, mainly attributed to lack of clear evidences and clinical guidelines.

 


Red Blood Cell Transfusion in Critically Ill Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: An International Survey of Physicians’ Attitudes
Paule Lessard Bonaventure
Paule Lessard Bonaventure
CCCF Academy. Lessard Bonaventure P. 11/09/2018; 233349; 98 Disclosure(s): none
user
Paule Lessard Bonaventure
Abstract
Discussion Forum (0)

Introduction:

Restrictive transfusion strategies have been advocated in the general critically ill population. However, considerable uncertainty exists regarding optimal transfusion thresholds in critically ill traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients due to the susceptibility of the injured brain to hypoxemic damages. We aimed to identify the determinants of red blood cell transfusion (RBC), and to ascertain the perceived optimal transfusion thresholds in adult patients with moderate to severe TBI.

 

Methods:

We conducted an electronic self-administered survey targeting all intensivists and neurosurgeons from Canada, Australia and the United Kingdom caring for TBI patients. The questionnaire was developed using a structured process of domains/items generation and reduction with a panel of experts. It was validated for clinical sensibility, reliability and content validity. 

 

Results:

The response rate was 28.7% (218/760). When presented with a scenario of a young patient with severe TBI, a wide range of transfusion practices was noted among respondents, with 47% favoring RBC transfusion at a hemoglobin level of 7g/dL or less in the acute phase of care, while 73% would use this trigger in the plateau phase. Multiple trauma, neuromonitoring data, hemorrhagic shock and planned surgeries were the most important factors thought to influence the need for transfusion. The level of evidence was the main reason mentioned to explain the uncertainty regarding RBC transfusion strategies. 

 

Conclusion:

In critically ill TBI patients, transfusion practices and hemoglobin thresholds for transfusion are said to be influenced by patients’ characteristics and the use of neuromonitoring in critical care physicians and neurosurgeons from Canada, Australia and the UK. Equipoise regarding optimal transfusion strategy is manifest, mainly attributed to lack of clear evidences and clinical guidelines.

 


Introduction:

Restrictive transfusion strategies have been advocated in the general critically ill population. However, considerable uncertainty exists regarding optimal transfusion thresholds in critically ill traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients due to the susceptibility of the injured brain to hypoxemic damages. We aimed to identify the determinants of red blood cell transfusion (RBC), and to ascertain the perceived optimal transfusion thresholds in adult patients with moderate to severe TBI.

 

Methods:

We conducted an electronic self-administered survey targeting all intensivists and neurosurgeons from Canada, Australia and the United Kingdom caring for TBI patients. The questionnaire was developed using a structured process of domains/items generation and reduction with a panel of experts. It was validated for clinical sensibility, reliability and content validity. 

 

Results:

The response rate was 28.7% (218/760). When presented with a scenario of a young patient with severe TBI, a wide range of transfusion practices was noted among respondents, with 47% favoring RBC transfusion at a hemoglobin level of 7g/dL or less in the acute phase of care, while 73% would use this trigger in the plateau phase. Multiple trauma, neuromonitoring data, hemorrhagic shock and planned surgeries were the most important factors thought to influence the need for transfusion. The level of evidence was the main reason mentioned to explain the uncertainty regarding RBC transfusion strategies. 

 

Conclusion:

In critically ill TBI patients, transfusion practices and hemoglobin thresholds for transfusion are said to be influenced by patients’ characteristics and the use of neuromonitoring in critical care physicians and neurosurgeons from Canada, Australia and the UK. Equipoise regarding optimal transfusion strategy is manifest, mainly attributed to lack of clear evidences and clinical guidelines.

 


By clicking “Accept Terms & all Cookies” or by continuing to browse, you agree to the storing of third-party cookies on your device to enhance your user experience and agree to the user terms and conditions of this learning management system (LMS).

Cookie Settings
Accept Terms & all Cookies