-
All Events
Critical Care Canada Forum 2023Mechanical Ventilation Symposium 2023Critical Care Canada Forum 2022Neuro Critical MasterclassMechanical Ventilation SymposiumCritical Care Canada Forum 2021 - Virtual ConferenceCritical Care Canada Forum 2020 - Virtual Conference -
All Content TypesAbstractePosterLearning moduleLive StreamPPT SharedWebcast
-
Sort ByRelevance
-
All TopicsAll Topics▸Acute Kidney Injury-Renal Replacement Therapy-Complications/Outcomes▸Acute Respiratory Failure and Mechanical Ventilation-Acute Respiratory Failure / ARDS-Mechanical Ventilation-Non-Invasive Ventilation-Weaning and Liberation▸COVID-19-Perspectives on the Pandemic-Pandemic Preparedness, Resource Allocation, and Triage-Management-Complications/Outcomes-Emerging Research/Future Directions-End of Life Care▸Extracorporeal Life Support-Respiratory Failure/ARDS-Cardiac Arrest/Cardiogenic Shock-Complications/Outcomes-Medical Education▸Neurocritical Care-Mechanical Ventilation-Traumatic Brain Injury/Sub-Arachnoid Hemorrhage-Imaging and Neuromonitoring-Post-Cardiac Arrest Care & Neuroprognostication-Seizures▸Organ Donation-Impacts of COVID on Organ Donation-Death by Neurologic Criteria-Death by Circulatory Criteria▸Patient Safety/Health Care Quality/ICU system-Healthcare Quality/Patient Safety-ICU System/Organization▸Pediatric Critical Care-Respiratory Failure/ARDS-Sepsis▸Prognostication, Recovery, and Outcomes-Prognostication-Recovery/Rehabilitation-Long-term Outcomes-Research-Sedation and Delirium▸Sepsis-Management-Complications/Outcomes-Specific Infections-Emerging Research/Future Directions-Sepsis Pathophysiology▸Shock and Resuscitation-Fluid Management-Vasopressors/Inotropes▸Special Populations-Chronic Critical Illness-Geriatrics/Frailty-Obstetrical Critical Care-Oncologic Critical Care-Trauma▸Wellness, Burnout, and Equity-Wellness/Burnout-Equity-Mental Health▸Cardiac Critical Care-Cardiogenic Shock-RV Function/dysfunction-Peri-cardiac arrest care-Atrial fibrillation-Post-cardiac arrest care▸Imaging/Monitoring-Ultrasound/POCUS-Neuroimaging/Neuromonitoring-Hematology-Career Development▸Patient-Centred Care/Ethics/Communication-Patient/Family Perspectives-Ethics-Communication with Patients/Families▸Hematology-Hypercoagulability/Thrombosis-Population Health-GI dysfunction
Topic: Education Science
Development of a structured scholar program for critical care fellows.
Marat Slessarev, W. Haddara, K. Bosma
Department of Medicine, Division of Critical Care, Western University, London, Canada | Department of Medicine, Division of Critical Care, Western University, London, Canada | Department of Medicine, Division of Critical Care, Western University, London, Canada
Introduction: Scholarship is an important mandate of academic institutions. According to Boyer, it can be broken down into four interdependent domains of research, integration, application and teaching (1). Accreditation requirements mandate scholarly activity in post-graduate medical programs in Canada (2), USA (3) and UK, but specific guidelines on how to incorporate this into existing curricula are lacking. This results in individual residency programs unintentionally biasing resident scholarly activity towards research projects, which is in keeping with existing pressures for publication-driven promotion in academic medicine (4). However, this approach can disadvantage residents with interests and career goals in other domains of scholarship.
Objectives: To develop a framework for designing structured scholarly program within post-graduate medical education residency program.
Methods: Residents and faculty of Canadian university-based critical care residency program were surveyed by means of individual interviews and focus groups to identify needs and goals of a scholarly program. These results were compared with existing national critical care training requirements to develop a hypothetical framework for proposed scholarly program, which was then edited in a series of iterations by end-users (residents and faculty) to incorporate user needs, maintain breadth of scholarship as defined by Boyer, provide opportunity for specialty specific scholarship and engage local institutional expertise.
Results: We developed a framework for designing structured scholarly program within residency programs by acknowledging the four domains of scholarship as defined by Boyer and applying user-centered design principles to develop scholarly program that includes broad categories, takes into account resident interests and future career goals, allows flexibility in scheduling, is specialty specific and engages local expertise and resources.
Conclusion: User-centered design principles can be applied to Boyer’s theory of scholarship to develop specialty specific scholarly program within post-graduate medical education residency program
References:
1 .Boyer EL. Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate. 1 edition. Princeton, N.J.: Jossey-Bass; 1997. 160 p.
2. The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. General Standards Applicable to All Residency Programs - B Standards [Internet]. [cited 2014 Aug 25]. Available from: http://www.royalcollege.ca/portal/page/portal/rc/common/documents/accreditation/accreditation_blue_book_b_standards_e.pdf
3. ACGME: Common Program Requirements [Internet]. [cited 2014 Aug 25]. Available from: https://www.acgme.org/acgmeweb/Portals/0/PFAssets/ProgramRequirements/CPRs2013.pdf
4.Van Wesel M. Evaluation by Citation: Trends in Publication Behavior, Evaluation Criteria, and the Strive for High Impact Publications. Sci Eng Ethics [Internet]. 2015 Mar 6 [cited 2015 Mar 11]; Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11948-015-9638-0
Topic: Education Science
Development of a structured scholar program for critical care fellows.
Marat Slessarev, W. Haddara, K. Bosma
Department of Medicine, Division of Critical Care, Western University, London, Canada | Department of Medicine, Division of Critical Care, Western University, London, Canada | Department of Medicine, Division of Critical Care, Western University, London, Canada
Introduction: Scholarship is an important mandate of academic institutions. According to Boyer, it can be broken down into four interdependent domains of research, integration, application and teaching (1). Accreditation requirements mandate scholarly activity in post-graduate medical programs in Canada (2), USA (3) and UK, but specific guidelines on how to incorporate this into existing curricula are lacking. This results in individual residency programs unintentionally biasing resident scholarly activity towards research projects, which is in keeping with existing pressures for publication-driven promotion in academic medicine (4). However, this approach can disadvantage residents with interests and career goals in other domains of scholarship.
Objectives: To develop a framework for designing structured scholarly program within post-graduate medical education residency program.
Methods: Residents and faculty of Canadian university-based critical care residency program were surveyed by means of individual interviews and focus groups to identify needs and goals of a scholarly program. These results were compared with existing national critical care training requirements to develop a hypothetical framework for proposed scholarly program, which was then edited in a series of iterations by end-users (residents and faculty) to incorporate user needs, maintain breadth of scholarship as defined by Boyer, provide opportunity for specialty specific scholarship and engage local institutional expertise.
Results: We developed a framework for designing structured scholarly program within residency programs by acknowledging the four domains of scholarship as defined by Boyer and applying user-centered design principles to develop scholarly program that includes broad categories, takes into account resident interests and future career goals, allows flexibility in scheduling, is specialty specific and engages local expertise and resources.
Conclusion: User-centered design principles can be applied to Boyer’s theory of scholarship to develop specialty specific scholarly program within post-graduate medical education residency program
References:
1 .Boyer EL. Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate. 1 edition. Princeton, N.J.: Jossey-Bass; 1997. 160 p.
2. The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. General Standards Applicable to All Residency Programs - B Standards [Internet]. [cited 2014 Aug 25]. Available from: http://www.royalcollege.ca/portal/page/portal/rc/common/documents/accreditation/accreditation_blue_book_b_standards_e.pdf
3. ACGME: Common Program Requirements [Internet]. [cited 2014 Aug 25]. Available from: https://www.acgme.org/acgmeweb/Portals/0/PFAssets/ProgramRequirements/CPRs2013.pdf
4.Van Wesel M. Evaluation by Citation: Trends in Publication Behavior, Evaluation Criteria, and the Strive for High Impact Publications. Sci Eng Ethics [Internet]. 2015 Mar 6 [cited 2015 Mar 11]; Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11948-015-9638-0
Topic: Education Science
Development of a structured scholar program for critical care fellows.
Marat Slessarev, W. Haddara, K. Bosma
Department of Medicine, Division of Critical Care, Western University, London, Canada | Department of Medicine, Division of Critical Care, Western University, London, Canada | Department of Medicine, Division of Critical Care, Western University, London, Canada
Introduction: Scholarship is an important mandate of academic institutions. According to Boyer, it can be broken down into four interdependent domains of research, integration, application and teaching (1). Accreditation requirements mandate scholarly activity in post-graduate medical programs in Canada (2), USA (3) and UK, but specific guidelines on how to incorporate this into existing curricula are lacking. This results in individual residency programs unintentionally biasing resident scholarly activity towards research projects, which is in keeping with existing pressures for publication-driven promotion in academic medicine (4). However, this approach can disadvantage residents with interests and career goals in other domains of scholarship.
Objectives: To develop a framework for designing structured scholarly program within post-graduate medical education residency program.
Methods: Residents and faculty of Canadian university-based critical care residency program were surveyed by means of individual interviews and focus groups to identify needs and goals of a scholarly program. These results were compared with existing national critical care training requirements to develop a hypothetical framework for proposed scholarly program, which was then edited in a series of iterations by end-users (residents and faculty) to incorporate user needs, maintain breadth of scholarship as defined by Boyer, provide opportunity for specialty specific scholarship and engage local institutional expertise.
Results: We developed a framework for designing structured scholarly program within residency programs by acknowledging the four domains of scholarship as defined by Boyer and applying user-centered design principles to develop scholarly program that includes broad categories, takes into account resident interests and future career goals, allows flexibility in scheduling, is specialty specific and engages local expertise and resources.
Conclusion: User-centered design principles can be applied to Boyer’s theory of scholarship to develop specialty specific scholarly program within post-graduate medical education residency program
References:
1 .Boyer EL. Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate. 1 edition. Princeton, N.J.: Jossey-Bass; 1997. 160 p.
2. The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. General Standards Applicable to All Residency Programs - B Standards [Internet]. [cited 2014 Aug 25]. Available from: http://www.royalcollege.ca/portal/page/portal/rc/common/documents/accreditation/accreditation_blue_book_b_standards_e.pdf
3. ACGME: Common Program Requirements [Internet]. [cited 2014 Aug 25]. Available from: https://www.acgme.org/acgmeweb/Portals/0/PFAssets/ProgramRequirements/CPRs2013.pdf
4.Van Wesel M. Evaluation by Citation: Trends in Publication Behavior, Evaluation Criteria, and the Strive for High Impact Publications. Sci Eng Ethics [Internet]. 2015 Mar 6 [cited 2015 Mar 11]; Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11948-015-9638-0
Topic: Education Science
Development of a structured scholar program for critical care fellows.
Marat Slessarev, W. Haddara, K. Bosma
Department of Medicine, Division of Critical Care, Western University, London, Canada | Department of Medicine, Division of Critical Care, Western University, London, Canada | Department of Medicine, Division of Critical Care, Western University, London, Canada
Introduction: Scholarship is an important mandate of academic institutions. According to Boyer, it can be broken down into four interdependent domains of research, integration, application and teaching (1). Accreditation requirements mandate scholarly activity in post-graduate medical programs in Canada (2), USA (3) and UK, but specific guidelines on how to incorporate this into existing curricula are lacking. This results in individual residency programs unintentionally biasing resident scholarly activity towards research projects, which is in keeping with existing pressures for publication-driven promotion in academic medicine (4). However, this approach can disadvantage residents with interests and career goals in other domains of scholarship.
Objectives: To develop a framework for designing structured scholarly program within post-graduate medical education residency program.
Methods: Residents and faculty of Canadian university-based critical care residency program were surveyed by means of individual interviews and focus groups to identify needs and goals of a scholarly program. These results were compared with existing national critical care training requirements to develop a hypothetical framework for proposed scholarly program, which was then edited in a series of iterations by end-users (residents and faculty) to incorporate user needs, maintain breadth of scholarship as defined by Boyer, provide opportunity for specialty specific scholarship and engage local institutional expertise.
Results: We developed a framework for designing structured scholarly program within residency programs by acknowledging the four domains of scholarship as defined by Boyer and applying user-centered design principles to develop scholarly program that includes broad categories, takes into account resident interests and future career goals, allows flexibility in scheduling, is specialty specific and engages local expertise and resources.
Conclusion: User-centered design principles can be applied to Boyer’s theory of scholarship to develop specialty specific scholarly program within post-graduate medical education residency program
References:
1 .Boyer EL. Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate. 1 edition. Princeton, N.J.: Jossey-Bass; 1997. 160 p.
2. The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. General Standards Applicable to All Residency Programs - B Standards [Internet]. [cited 2014 Aug 25]. Available from: http://www.royalcollege.ca/portal/page/portal/rc/common/documents/accreditation/accreditation_blue_book_b_standards_e.pdf
3. ACGME: Common Program Requirements [Internet]. [cited 2014 Aug 25]. Available from: https://www.acgme.org/acgmeweb/Portals/0/PFAssets/ProgramRequirements/CPRs2013.pdf
4.Van Wesel M. Evaluation by Citation: Trends in Publication Behavior, Evaluation Criteria, and the Strive for High Impact Publications. Sci Eng Ethics [Internet]. 2015 Mar 6 [cited 2015 Mar 11]; Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11948-015-9638-0
